Lebanon vs Panama: Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lebanon
- Panama
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 3,411 t against 3,228 t in Panama, a difference of 183 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 119th and Panama ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,291 t | 1,443 t | 151.84 t | Panama |
| 1970s | 1,385 t | 1,862 t | 476.24 t | Panama |
| 1980s | 1,607 t | 2,127 t | 519.85 t | Panama |
| 1990s | 2,889 t | 2,185 t | 704.75 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 3,160 t | 2,406 t | 753.85 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 3,369 t | 2,650 t | 718.61 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 3,466 t | 3,439 t | 26.77 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus, Lebanon or Panama?
- Lebanon, at 3,411 t against 3,228 t in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus between Lebanon and Panama?
- 183 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Panama rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Lebanon ranks 119th and Panama ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).