Lesotho vs Luxembourg: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lesotho
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 610.58 t against 608.37 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 2.21 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 159th and Luxembourg ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 539.83 t | 735.7 t | 195.87 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 517.61 t | 696.55 t | 178.94 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 453.12 t | 626.31 t | 173.19 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Lesotho or Luxembourg?
- Lesotho, at 610.58 t against 608.37 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 2.21 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Luxembourg rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Lesotho ranks 159th and Luxembourg ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).