Lithuania vs Sri Lanka: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lithuania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 30,177 t against 26,199 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 3,978 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Lithuania ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,357 t | 17,390 t | 6,034 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 13,362 t | 20,161 t | 6,799 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 23,652 t | 25,446 t | 1,794 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 31,108 t | 27,568 t | 3,540 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Lithuania or Sri Lanka?
- Lithuania, at 30,177 t against 26,199 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 3,978 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Lithuania ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).