Malaysia vs Uzbekistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malaysia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 85,888 t against 76,970 t in Malaysia, a difference of 8,918 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Malaysia ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42,783 t | 59,473 t | 16,690 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 61,553 t | 66,752 t | 5,199 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 77,582 t | 74,775 t | 2,807 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 77,617 t | 80,538 t | 2,921 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Malaysia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 85,888 t against 76,970 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Malaysia and Uzbekistan?
- 8,918 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Malaysia ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).