Mexico vs Türkiye: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mexico
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 261,066 t against 199,869 t in Mexico, a difference of 61,197 t.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.3 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Mexico ranks 18th and Türkiye ranks 16th of 185 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 78,278 t | 87,610 t | 9,331 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 98,869 t | 121,278 t | 22,409 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 129,945 t | 157,781 t | 27,836 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 141,249 t | 185,517 t | 44,268 t | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 163,855 t | 201,402 t | 37,548 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 188,371 t | 224,232 t | 35,860 t | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 200,230 t | 245,644 t | 45,414 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Mexico or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 261,066 t against 199,869 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Mexico and Türkiye?
- 61,197 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Türkiye rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Mexico ranks 18th and Türkiye ranks 16th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).