Nigeria vs Pakistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Nigeria
- Pakistan
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 296,650 t against 296,517 t in Pakistan, a difference of 133 t.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.
Nigeria ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 68,202 t | 59,254 t | 8,948 t | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 68,430 t | 86,413 t | 17,983 t | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 82,004 t | 125,653 t | 43,649 t | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 160,547 t | 172,570 t | 12,024 t | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 215,148 t | 215,947 t | 798.9 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 246,842 t | 248,884 t | 2,042 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 295,488 t | 268,397 t | 27,091 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Nigeria or Pakistan?
- Nigeria, at 296,650 t against 296,517 t in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Nigeria and Pakistan?
- 133 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Pakistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Nigeria ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).