Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Rwanda
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 10,901 t against 10,404 t in Rwanda, a difference of 497 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 98th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,744 t | 1,846 t | 897.96 t | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 3,901 t | 1,649 t | 2,253 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 5,097 t | 8,324 t | 3,227 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 4,168 t | 15,212 t | 11,044 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 6,832 t | 12,492 t | 5,659 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 9,442 t | 8,104 t | 1,338 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 10,252 t | 10,354 t | 101.51 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Rwanda or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 10,901 t against 10,404 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
- 497 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Saudi Arabia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Rwanda ranks 98th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).