Slovakia vs Zambia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Slovakia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 22,119 t against 22,031 t in Slovakia, a difference of 88 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 74th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,974 t | 5,888 t | 10,086 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 15,223 t | 7,799 t | 7,425 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 18,114 t | 16,153 t | 1,960 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 20,598 t | 19,327 t | 1,271 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Slovakia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 22,119 t against 22,031 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Slovakia and Zambia?
- 88 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Zambia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Zambia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Slovakia ranks 74th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).