Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Tunisia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 14,891 t against 14,106 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 785 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 25 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Tunisia ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,017 t | 6,198 t | 181.15 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 9,565 t | 10,392 t | 827.48 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 10,205 t | 13,213 t | 3,008 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 15,597 t | 11,928 t | 3,669 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 15,676 t | 12,002 t | 3,674 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 17,608 t | 10,501 t | 7,106 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 19,184 t | 14,331 t | 4,854 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus, Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
- Tunisia, at 14,891 t against 14,106 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 785 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Tunisia ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).