Armenia vs Uganda: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 15.16 kg/ha against 15.02 kg/ha in Armenia, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uganda ahead.
Armenia ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 126th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.91 kg/ha | 13.31 kg/ha | 1.4 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 15.69 kg/ha | 14.28 kg/ha | 1.41 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2010s | 19.8 kg/ha | 11.55 kg/ha | 8.25 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 14.69 kg/ha | 15.37 kg/ha | 0.6848 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Armenia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 15.16 kg/ha against 15.02 kg/ha in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Armenia and Uganda?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Uganda rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 126th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).