Bahrain vs Czechia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bahrain
- Czechia
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 27.32 kg/ha against 27.24 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Bahrain ranks 68th and Czechia ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.21 kg/ha | 19.88 kg/ha | 3.67 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 17.51 kg/ha | 22.63 kg/ha | 5.12 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 23.54 kg/ha | 26.47 kg/ha | 2.93 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 26.61 kg/ha | 27.76 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Bahrain or Czechia?
- Bahrain, at 27.32 kg/ha against 27.24 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Bahrain and Czechia?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bahrain and Czechia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bahrain ranks 68th and Czechia ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).