Barbados vs Czechia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Barbados
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 27.24 kg/ha against 26.44 kg/ha in Barbados, a difference of 0.8 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 72nd and Czechia ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46 kg/ha | 19.88 kg/ha | 26.12 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2000s | 43.67 kg/ha | 22.63 kg/ha | 21.04 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2010s | 33.3 kg/ha | 26.47 kg/ha | 6.83 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2020s | 28.39 kg/ha | 27.76 kg/ha | 0.6385 kg/ha | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Barbados or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 27.24 kg/ha against 26.44 kg/ha in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Barbados and Czechia?
- 0.8 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Czechia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Barbados ranks 72nd and Czechia ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).