Cameroon vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Cameroon
18.49 kg/ha
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
18.54 kg/ha
in 2023
Cameroon rank
107th
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
106th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Cameroon
  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 18.54 kg/ha against 18.49 kg/ha in Cameroon, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.

Cameroon ranks 107th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 106th of 185 countries.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 4.44 kg/ha 14.57 kg/ha 10.13 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
1970s 5.37 kg/ha 9.22 kg/ha 3.85 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
1980s 5.83 kg/ha 9.68 kg/ha 3.85 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
1990s 7.28 kg/ha 11.73 kg/ha 4.46 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2000s 10.53 kg/ha 13.88 kg/ha 3.35 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2010s 16.35 kg/ha 17.35 kg/ha 0.9984 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2020s 18.29 kg/ha 18.49 kg/ha 0.197 kg/ha Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Cameroon or Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 18.54 kg/ha against 18.49 kg/ha in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
0.05 kg/ha, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Cameroon ranks 107th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 106th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cameroon/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cameroon/equatorial-guinea/">Cameroon vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).