Croatia vs Nigeria: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Croatia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 24.25 kg/ha against 23.56 kg/ha in Nigeria, a difference of 0.69 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 79th and Nigeria ranks 81st of 186 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.27 kg/ha | 14.23 kg/ha | 6.03 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2000s | 29.86 kg/ha | 16.57 kg/ha | 13.29 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2010s | 32.98 kg/ha | 19.67 kg/ha | 13.31 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2020s | 30.88 kg/ha | 23.26 kg/ha | 7.61 kg/ha | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Croatia or Nigeria?
- Croatia, at 24.25 kg/ha against 23.56 kg/ha in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Croatia and Nigeria?
- 0.69 kg/ha, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Nigeria?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Nigeria rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Croatia ranks 79th and Nigeria ranks 81st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).