Cuba vs Estonia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Estonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 12.7 kg/ha against 12.08 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.62 kg/ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 143rd and Estonia ranks 146th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.16 kg/ha | 6.6 kg/ha | 12.56 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 18.62 kg/ha | 9.04 kg/ha | 9.58 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 21.14 kg/ha | 11.97 kg/ha | 9.17 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 14.04 kg/ha | 14.25 kg/ha | 0.2078 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Estonia?
- Cuba, at 12.7 kg/ha against 12.08 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Estonia?
- 0.62 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Estonia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 143rd and Estonia ranks 146th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).