Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Cuba
12.7 kg/ha
in 2023
Zimbabwe
13.41 kg/ha
in 2023
Cuba rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
140th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
102030405060196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 13.41 kg/ha against 12.7 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.71 kg/ha.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 185 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 40.57 kg/ha 13.12 kg/ha 27.46 kg/ha Cuba
1970s 32.41 kg/ha 13.59 kg/ha 18.83 kg/ha Cuba
1980s 33.64 kg/ha 12.75 kg/ha 20.89 kg/ha Cuba
1990s 22.21 kg/ha 10.49 kg/ha 11.72 kg/ha Cuba
2000s 18.62 kg/ha 8.85 kg/ha 9.78 kg/ha Cuba
2010s 21.14 kg/ha 9.24 kg/ha 11.91 kg/ha Cuba
2020s 14.04 kg/ha 12.84 kg/ha 1.2 kg/ha Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 13.41 kg/ha against 12.7 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
0.71 kg/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Cuba ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).