Czechia vs Japan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 27.25 kg/ha against 27.24 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Japan ahead.
Czechia ranks 71st and Japan ranks 69th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.88 kg/ha | 29.91 kg/ha | 10.03 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 22.63 kg/ha | 29.67 kg/ha | 7.03 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 26.47 kg/ha | 27.83 kg/ha | 1.36 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 27.76 kg/ha | 27.73 kg/ha | 0.0261 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechia or Japan?
- Japan, at 27.25 kg/ha against 27.24 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechia and Japan?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Japan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Japan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 71st and Japan ranks 69th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).