Czechoslovakia vs Panama: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Panama
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 20.05 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 96th and Panama ranks 97th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18.46 kg/ha | 15.68 kg/ha | 2.78 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 20.09 kg/ha | 23.72 kg/ha | 3.62 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1980s | 22.01 kg/ha | 23.35 kg/ha | 1.34 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1990s | 21.41 kg/ha | 20.19 kg/ha | 1.22 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Panama?
- Czechoslovakia, at 20.05 kg/ha against 20.05 kg/ha in Panama as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Panama?
- 0 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Panama rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 96th and Panama ranks 97th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).