Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Polynesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
20.72 kg/ha
in 2023
Polynesia
24.18 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
9th
Polynesia rank
8th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Polynesia
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Polynesia currently reports 24.18 kg/ha against 20.72 kg/ha in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 3.46 kg/ha.

That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.2 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Polynesia ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 9th and Polynesia ranks 8th of 18 countries.

Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 13.88 kg/ha 38.89 kg/ha 25.01 kg/ha Polynesia
1970s 18.1 kg/ha 36.77 kg/ha 18.67 kg/ha Polynesia
1980s 22.7 kg/ha 31.18 kg/ha 8.48 kg/ha Polynesia
1990s 23.1 kg/ha 27.85 kg/ha 4.75 kg/ha Polynesia
2000s 23.5 kg/ha 33.72 kg/ha 10.22 kg/ha Polynesia
2010s 22.9 kg/ha 27.95 kg/ha 5.05 kg/ha Polynesia
2020s 21.22 kg/ha 24 kg/ha 2.79 kg/ha Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Polynesia?
Polynesia, at 24.18 kg/ha against 20.72 kg/ha in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Polynesia?
3.46 kg/ha, with Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Polynesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Polynesia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 9th and Polynesia ranks 8th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Polynesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/polynesia/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Polynesia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).