Eritrea vs Lesotho: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 4.23 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 181st and Lesotho ranks 178th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.8 kg/ha | 4.21 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 3.9 kg/ha | 3.77 kg/ha | 0.1293 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 3.86 kg/ha | 4.65 kg/ha | 0.7906 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 3.94 kg/ha | 4.6 kg/ha | 0.6595 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 4.23 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 181st and Lesotho ranks 178th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).