Ethiopia PDR vs Libya: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Libya
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 5.41 kg/ha against 4.72 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.69 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 173rd and Libya ranks 176th of 185 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.69 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | 2.6 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 3.79 kg/ha | 1.85 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 4.97 kg/ha | 2.94 kg/ha | 2.03 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 5.84 kg/ha | 3.32 kg/ha | 2.52 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Libya?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 5.41 kg/ha against 4.72 kg/ha in Libya as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Libya?
- 0.69 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Libya rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 173rd and Libya ranks 176th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).