Ethiopia vs Luxembourg: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 14.63 kg/ha against 14.57 kg/ha in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.7 kg/ha | 18.34 kg/ha | 9.65 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 13.01 kg/ha | 16.32 kg/ha | 3.31 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 14.26 kg/ha | 14.91 kg/ha | 0.646 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia or Luxembourg?
- Ethiopia, at 14.63 kg/ha against 14.57 kg/ha in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia and Luxembourg?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Luxembourg rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 131st and Luxembourg ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).