Ethiopia vs Madagascar: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 14.75 kg/ha against 14.63 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Madagascar ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 131st and Madagascar ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.63 kg/ha | 9.62 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 8.7 kg/ha | 11.01 kg/ha | 2.31 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 13.01 kg/ha | 13.3 kg/ha | 0.2922 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 14.26 kg/ha | 14.21 kg/ha | 0.0493 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 14.75 kg/ha against 14.63 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia and Madagascar?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Madagascar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Madagascar rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 131st and Madagascar ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).