Europe vs Uzbekistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Europe
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 50.32 kg/ha against 18.18 kg/ha in Europe, a difference of 32.14 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.8 times Europe's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.34 kg/ha | 31.02 kg/ha | 16.68 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 15.15 kg/ha | 33.84 kg/ha | 18.69 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 17.23 kg/ha | 42.34 kg/ha | 25.12 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 18.19 kg/ha | 47.42 kg/ha | 29.23 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Europe or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 50.32 kg/ha against 18.18 kg/ha in Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 32.14 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Europe and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Europe ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).