Finland vs USSR: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Finland
- USSR
How they compare
Finland currently reports 9.61 kg/ha against 8.22 kg/ha in USSR, a difference of 1.39 kg/ha.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times USSR's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 158th and USSR ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and USSR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.67 kg/ha | 7.53 kg/ha | 0.858 kg/ha | USSR |
| 1970s | 9.44 kg/ha | 9.43 kg/ha | 0.0075 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1980s | 11.07 kg/ha | 9.31 kg/ha | 1.76 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1990s | 13.07 kg/ha | 9.1 kg/ha | 3.98 kg/ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Finland or USSR?
- Finland, at 9.61 kg/ha against 8.22 kg/ha in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Finland and USSR?
- 1.39 kg/ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Finland and USSR rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Finland ranks 158th and USSR ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).