Georgia vs Latvia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 13.11 kg/ha against 12.6 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.51 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Georgia ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.79 kg/ha | 10.17 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 10.28 kg/ha | 11.65 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 11.11 kg/ha | 13.32 kg/ha | 2.21 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 13.46 kg/ha | 14.71 kg/ha | 1.25 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 13.11 kg/ha against 12.6 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Latvia?
- 0.51 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).