Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 13.41 kg/ha against 12.6 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.81 kg/ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.79 kg/ha | 10.29 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 10.28 kg/ha | 8.85 kg/ha | 1.43 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 11.11 kg/ha | 9.24 kg/ha | 1.87 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 13.46 kg/ha | 12.84 kg/ha | 0.6197 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 13.41 kg/ha against 12.6 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.81 kg/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 141st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).