Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
14.29 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
14.63 kg/ha
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
16th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
5101520196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 14.63 kg/ha against 14.29 kg/ha in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 0.34 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) averaged higher in 5 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 3.99 kg/ha 5.22 kg/ha 1.23 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 5.82 kg/ha 6 kg/ha 0.1796 kg/ha United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 8.43 kg/ha 6.84 kg/ha 1.59 kg/ha Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1990s 11.32 kg/ha 7.7 kg/ha 3.62 kg/ha Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2000s 14.24 kg/ha 10.39 kg/ha 3.85 kg/ha Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2010s 15.8 kg/ha 13.84 kg/ha 1.96 kg/ha Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2020s 14.43 kg/ha 14.14 kg/ha 0.2899 kg/ha Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 14.63 kg/ha against 14.29 kg/ha in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.34 kg/ha, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 16th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/iran-islamic-republic-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-harvest-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/iran-islamic-republic-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).