Italy vs Kenya: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Italy
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 22.33 kg/ha against 22.21 kg/ha in Italy, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 86th and Kenya ranks 85th of 186 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.61 kg/ha | 7.32 kg/ha | 10.29 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1970s | 22.13 kg/ha | 9.54 kg/ha | 12.6 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1980s | 25.6 kg/ha | 11.29 kg/ha | 14.32 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1990s | 27.34 kg/ha | 13.73 kg/ha | 13.61 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2000s | 27.32 kg/ha | 17.71 kg/ha | 9.61 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2010s | 25.58 kg/ha | 19.64 kg/ha | 5.94 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2020s | 22.88 kg/ha | 21.24 kg/ha | 1.65 kg/ha | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Italy or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 22.33 kg/ha against 22.21 kg/ha in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Italy and Kenya?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Kenya rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Italy ranks 86th and Kenya ranks 85th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).