Jamaica vs Tajikistan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Jamaica
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 35.09 kg/ha against 33.6 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 1.49 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 46th and Tajikistan ranks 49th of 186 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40.23 kg/ha | 19.43 kg/ha | 20.8 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 36.42 kg/ha | 27.36 kg/ha | 9.05 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 36.8 kg/ha | 31.47 kg/ha | 5.33 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 36.49 kg/ha | 33.17 kg/ha | 3.32 kg/ha | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Jamaica or Tajikistan?
- Jamaica, at 35.09 kg/ha against 33.6 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Jamaica and Tajikistan?
- 1.49 kg/ha, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Tajikistan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Jamaica ranks 46th and Tajikistan ranks 49th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).