Kazakhstan vs Sudan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.31 kg/ha against 4.65 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.66 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 175th and Sudan ranks 178th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.43 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | 0.6412 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 5.81 kg/ha | 5.34 kg/ha | 0.4781 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Sudan?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.31 kg/ha against 4.65 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 0.66 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 175th and Sudan ranks 178th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).