Kyrgyzstan vs Qatar: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Qatar
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 19.25 kg/ha against 18.66 kg/ha in Qatar, a difference of 0.59 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th and Qatar ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.47 kg/ha | 12.58 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2000s | 17.53 kg/ha | 11.17 kg/ha | 6.36 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 18.79 kg/ha | 10.38 kg/ha | 8.41 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 19.26 kg/ha | 15.72 kg/ha | 3.54 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Qatar?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 19.25 kg/ha against 18.66 kg/ha in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Qatar?
- 0.59 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Qatar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Qatar rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 104th and Qatar ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).