Lesotho, Kingdom of vs Sudan: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lesotho, Kingdom of
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 4.65 kg/ha against 4.23 kg/ha in Lesotho, Kingdom of, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho, Kingdom of's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Lesotho, Kingdom of ahead.
Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 178th and Sudan ranks 177th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho, Kingdom of | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.7 kg/ha | 4.79 kg/ha | 0.0818 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 4.6 kg/ha | 5.34 kg/ha | 0.7374 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Lesotho, Kingdom of or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 4.65 kg/ha against 4.23 kg/ha in Lesotho, Kingdom of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Lesotho, Kingdom of and Sudan?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho, Kingdom of and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho, Kingdom of and Sudan rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 178th and Sudan ranks 177th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).