Montenegro vs Serbia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- Serbia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 29.51 kg/ha against 29.42 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.09 kg/ha.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.37 kg/ha | 25.52 kg/ha | 25.85 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 34.54 kg/ha | 27.37 kg/ha | 7.17 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 31.72 kg/ha | 28.43 kg/ha | 3.29 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Montenegro or Serbia?
- Montenegro, at 29.51 kg/ha against 29.42 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Montenegro and Serbia?
- 0.09 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Serbia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).