North Macedonia vs Suriname: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- North Macedonia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 18.38 kg/ha against 17.95 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.43 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Suriname ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 114th and Suriname ranks 112th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.86 kg/ha | 21.85 kg/ha | 8.99 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2000s | 16.7 kg/ha | 23.55 kg/ha | 6.85 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 20.32 kg/ha | 29 kg/ha | 8.68 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 20.07 kg/ha | 19.47 kg/ha | 0.6012 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area, North Macedonia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 18.38 kg/ha against 17.95 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area between North Macedonia and Suriname?
- 0.43 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Suriname rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- North Macedonia ranks 114th and Suriname ranks 112th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).