Albania vs Lebanon: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Albania
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 13,273 t against 11,371 t in Albania, a difference of 1,902 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.2 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Albania ranks 119th and Lebanon ranks 117th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,076 t | 4,679 t | 397.73 t | Albania |
| 1970s | 7,696 t | 5,703 t | 1,993 t | Albania |
| 1980s | 10,107 t | 7,091 t | 3,016 t | Albania |
| 1990s | 6,288 t | 12,623 t | 6,335 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 6,746 t | 11,835 t | 5,089 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 10,059 t | 12,446 t | 2,387 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 11,372 t | 13,331 t | 1,959 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Albania or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 13,273 t against 11,371 t in Albania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Albania and Lebanon?
- 1,902 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Lebanon rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Albania ranks 119th and Lebanon ranks 117th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).