Albania vs Panama: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Albania
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 13,653 t against 11,371 t in Albania, a difference of 2,282 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Albania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 119th and Panama ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,076 t | 8,714 t | 3,637 t | Panama |
| 1970s | 7,696 t | 12,957 t | 5,261 t | Panama |
| 1980s | 10,107 t | 13,848 t | 3,741 t | Panama |
| 1990s | 6,288 t | 12,670 t | 6,381 t | Panama |
| 2000s | 6,746 t | 11,002 t | 4,257 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 10,059 t | 11,433 t | 1,374 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 11,372 t | 15,381 t | 4,009 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Albania or Panama?
- Panama, at 13,653 t against 11,371 t in Albania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Albania and Panama?
- 2,282 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Panama rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Albania ranks 119th and Panama ranks 116th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).