Algeria vs Belarus: Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Algeria
- Belarus
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 98,790 t against 93,432 t in Belarus, a difference of 5,358 t.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Algeria ranks 51st and Belarus ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,491 t | 92,477 t | 60,986 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 45,941 t | 102,140 t | 56,199 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 87,703 t | 102,389 t | 14,686 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 95,534 t | 91,398 t | 4,136 t | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal β cropland potassium, Algeria or Belarus?
- Algeria, at 98,790 t against 93,432 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal β cropland potassium between Algeria and Belarus?
- 5,358 t, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Belarus rank globally for crop harvest removal β cropland potassium?
- Algeria ranks 51st and Belarus ranks 54th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).