Algeria vs Nepal: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Algeria
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 107,140 t against 98,790 t in Algeria, a difference of 8,350 t.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 48th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,429 t | 17,337 t | 3,092 t | Algeria |
| 1970s | 20,539 t | 20,228 t | 311.67 t | Algeria |
| 1980s | 23,277 t | 27,008 t | 3,730 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 31,208 t | 46,593 t | 15,385 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 45,941 t | 64,456 t | 18,515 t | Nepal |
| 2010s | 87,703 t | 89,719 t | 2,016 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 95,534 t | 106,032 t | 10,498 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Algeria or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 107,140 t against 98,790 t in Algeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Algeria and Nepal?
- 8,350 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Nepal rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Algeria ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 48th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).