Angola vs Uganda: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Angola
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 137,931 t against 120,924 t in Angola, a difference of 17,007 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Angola ranks 44th and Uganda ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,490 t | 52,134 t | 34,644 t | Uganda |
| 1970s | 18,322 t | 82,917 t | 64,595 t | Uganda |
| 1980s | 12,566 t | 71,969 t | 59,404 t | Uganda |
| 1990s | 16,474 t | 92,155 t | 75,681 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 46,187 t | 115,144 t | 68,957 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 92,784 t | 104,880 t | 12,096 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 112,411 t | 139,868 t | 27,456 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Angola or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 137,931 t against 120,924 t in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Angola and Uganda?
- 17,007 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Uganda rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Angola ranks 44th and Uganda ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).