Bahamas vs Montenegro: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Bahamas
- Montenegro
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 479.41 t against 423.17 t in Montenegro, a difference of 56.24 t.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Bahamas ranks 165th and Montenegro ranks 167th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 268 t | 705.86 t | 437.86 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 453.45 t | 487.05 t | 33.6 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 477.81 t | 455.28 t | 22.53 t | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Bahamas or Montenegro?
- Bahamas, at 479.41 t against 423.17 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Bahamas and Montenegro?
- 56.24 t, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Montenegro rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Bahamas ranks 165th and Montenegro ranks 167th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).