Barbados vs Grenada: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- Grenada
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 211.5 t against 184.14 t in Grenada, a difference of 27.36 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 184th and Grenada ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,314 t | 444.18 t | 1,870 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 1,593 t | 406.78 t | 1,186 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1,242 t | 361.83 t | 880.33 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 809.86 t | 304.56 t | 505.3 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 639.25 t | 193.58 t | 445.67 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 328.94 t | 240.65 t | 88.29 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 227.15 t | 200.81 t | 26.34 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Barbados or Grenada?
- Barbados, at 211.5 t against 184.14 t in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Barbados and Grenada?
- 27.36 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Grenada rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 184th and Grenada ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).