Belarus vs Cambodia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 96,734 t against 93,432 t in Belarus, a difference of 3,302 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 54th and Cambodia ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92,477 t | 15,886 t | 76,591 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 102,140 t | 29,550 t | 72,590 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 102,389 t | 72,068 t | 30,321 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 91,398 t | 91,335 t | 62.8 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Belarus or Cambodia?
- Cambodia, at 96,734 t against 93,432 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Belarus and Cambodia?
- 3,302 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cambodia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Cambodia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 54th and Cambodia ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).