Belgium vs Rwanda: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Rwanda
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 63,389 t against 59,847 t in Rwanda, a difference of 3,542 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72,294 t | 46,802 t | 25,492 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 67,286 t | 53,210 t | 14,076 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 61,871 t | 58,481 t | 3,390 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Belgium or Rwanda?
- Belgium, at 63,389 t against 59,847 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Belgium and Rwanda?
- 3,542 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Rwanda rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).