Benin vs Sudan (former): Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Benin
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Benin currently reports 79,881 t against 79,778 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 103 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 62nd and Sudan (former) ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,765 t | 34,485 t | 26,720 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 9,475 t | 46,307 t | 36,832 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 12,443 t | 47,804 t | 35,361 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 25,386 t | 54,413 t | 29,027 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 36,915 t | 74,064 t | 37,150 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 42,895 t | 72,122 t | 29,227 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Benin or Sudan (former)?
- Benin, at 79,881 t against 79,778 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Benin and Sudan (former)?
- 103 t, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Benin and Sudan (former) rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Benin ranks 62nd and Sudan (former) ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).