Bhutan vs Suriname: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Suriname
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 1,157 t against 1,019 t in Suriname, a difference of 138 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 155th and Suriname ranks 157th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 733.35 t | 874.79 t | 141.44 t | Suriname |
| 1970s | 928.46 t | 1,217 t | 288.38 t | Suriname |
| 1980s | 1,221 t | 1,608 t | 387.81 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 1,311 t | 1,475 t | 163.61 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1,547 t | 1,356 t | 191.75 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 1,741 t | 1,916 t | 175.86 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,364 t | 1,153 t | 211.7 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Suriname?
- Bhutan, at 1,157 t against 1,019 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Suriname?
- 138 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Suriname rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 155th and Suriname ranks 157th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).