Botswana vs Tonga: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Botswana
- Tonga
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1,050 t against 650.48 t in Tonga, a difference of 399.52 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.6 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tonga ahead.
Botswana ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 574.51 t | 1,031 t | 456.42 t | Tonga |
| 1970s | 771.95 t | 1,002 t | 229.64 t | Tonga |
| 1980s | 706 t | 682.46 t | 23.54 t | Botswana |
| 1990s | 608.58 t | 537.98 t | 70.6 t | Botswana |
| 2000s | 633.8 t | 739.23 t | 105.43 t | Tonga |
| 2010s | 798.35 t | 814.98 t | 16.63 t | Tonga |
| 2020s | 1,317 t | 636.47 t | 680.69 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Botswana or Tonga?
- Botswana, at 1,050 t against 650.48 t in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Botswana and Tonga?
- 399.52 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Tonga rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Botswana ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).