Burundi vs Cuba: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Burundi
- Cuba
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 48,638 t against 45,244 t in Cuba, a difference of 3,394 t.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Burundi ranks 80th and Cuba ranks 83rd of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19,562 t | 76,272 t | 56,710 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 21,496 t | 99,738 t | 78,242 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 24,795 t | 119,605 t | 94,810 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 28,166 t | 89,881 t | 61,715 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 30,547 t | 76,270 t | 45,723 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 33,729 t | 75,584 t | 41,855 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 48,695 t | 50,000 t | 1,305 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Burundi or Cuba?
- Burundi, at 48,638 t against 45,244 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Burundi and Cuba?
- 3,394 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Cuba rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Burundi ranks 80th and Cuba ranks 83rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).