Caribbean vs Ethiopia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Caribbean
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 354,830 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 84,848 t.
That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.3 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 26th and Ethiopia ranks 25th of 29 countries.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 149,439 t | 69,582 t | 79,857 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 194,133 t | 112,922 t | 81,211 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 255,324 t | 222,662 t | 32,663 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 311,045 t | 264,383 t | 46,662 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Caribbean or Ethiopia?
- Caribbean, at 354,830 t against 269,982 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Caribbean and Ethiopia?
- 84,848 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Ethiopia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Caribbean ranks 26th and Ethiopia ranks 25th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).