Central African Republic vs Croatia: Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium
Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Central African Republic
- Croatia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 23,538 t against 22,969 t in Croatia, a difference of 569 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 102nd and Croatia ranks 103rd of 186 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,281 t | 24,165 t | 15,884 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 8,987 t | 27,959 t | 18,972 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 15,773 t | 30,644 t | 14,870 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 22,622 t | 29,233 t | 6,611 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop harvest removal — cropland potassium, Central African Republic or Croatia?
- Central African Republic, at 23,538 t against 22,969 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop harvest removal — cropland potassium between Central African Republic and Croatia?
- 569 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Croatia rank globally for crop harvest removal — cropland potassium?
- Central African Republic ranks 102nd and Croatia ranks 103rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop harvest removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).